Tile adhesives, sealants, mortars and coatings ship with the data that matters locked in PDFs — application sheets and safety data sheets. Where ETIM and BMEcat help, where they stop, and how to get the datasheet content into structured attributes.
Open the product page of a tile adhesive and look at what a buyer actually needs to know: what surface it bonds to, how much you consume per square meter, the pot life, the working temperature range — and, right next to it, the hazard pictograms, the H- and P-statements, the CLP classification. Now look at where that information comes from. Almost none of it is in the shop feed. It's in two PDFs: a technical data sheet and a safety data sheet. That is the whole problem of construction-chemical product data.
Product data for construction chemicals is datasheet data: application information and safety information that arrives as PDFs, not as structured attributes. This is a sub-branch of the broader DIY & hardware challenge — but with a sharper, more specific pain: the value and the compliance obligation both live inside documents that no feed carries.
Every other category has some of this problem. Construction chemicals has all of it, because the two documents that define the product are both unstructured PDFs:
Done by hand, this means opening every PDF, finding the right figures, and retyping them into your product record — the single most tedious job in the whole assortment. The structural fix is the same as everywhere: read the PDF and turn it into attributes — here that isn't a nice-to-have, it's the core of the work.
Building materials do have connecting standards, and construction chemicals sits partly inside them. ETIM gives a shared classification and attribute skeleton for many product groups; BMEcat is the common B2B transport format for exchanging catalogs. Both are useful — but neither carries the datasheet content:
| Data layer | What ETIM / BMEcat deliver | Where it stops |
|---|---|---|
| Classification | ETIM class + defined attributes per group | Only where the group is well-modeled — niche products thin out |
| Catalog exchange | BMEcat transports the structured record | Only carries what someone already extracted into it |
| Application data | — | Consumption, pot life, temperature range live in the PDF |
| Safety data (GHS/CLP) | — | H/P-statements, pictograms, VOC stay in the SDS PDF |
| Source document | — | The SDS itself still has to be stored and attached |
In short: ETIM and BMEcat give you a skeleton and a way to move data around, but they assume the data already exists in structured form. In construction chemicals it doesn't — it's still trapped in the datasheet. Closing that gap is the actual work.
The throughline is turning documents into structured, compliant data — and that's exactly what Productbay is built for:
The point: Productbay starts where ETIM and BMEcat end. The classification gives you the frame; the datasheet gives you the content — and getting that content out of the PDF, reviewed and attached, is the job. Productbay is built for specialist retailers running multi-supplier, multi-channel catalogs — from mid-sized shops to large chains.
Safety data sheets, application sheets, GHS/CLP blocks — construction chemicals hides its data in PDFs. See how Productbay reads those datasheets, turns them into structured attributes and keeps the source document attached, in a 30-minute walkthrough.
Get started