Product Data for Construction Chemicals: Safety and Application Data

Tile adhesives, sealants, mortars and coatings ship with the data that matters locked in PDFs — application sheets and safety data sheets. Where ETIM and BMEcat help, where they stop, and how to get the datasheet content into structured attributes.

Jakob Feinböck, ProductbayJuly 4, 20267 min read
☝️Key takeaways
  • In construction chemicals the decisive data lives in PDFs: technical application data sheets and safety data sheets (GHS/CLP) — not in a clean feed.
  • Standards like ETIM and BMEcat carry the classification and transport skeleton, but never the datasheet content: consumption, pot life, VOC values, H/P-statements stay in the PDF.
  • So the work is reading every PDF by hand and retyping attributes — plus keeping the safety data sheet itself attached for compliance.
  • Productbay turns PDF datasheets into structured attributes with AI, keeps the source PDF linked, and runs a review step because safety data is compliance-relevant.

Open the product page of a tile adhesive and look at what a buyer actually needs to know: what surface it bonds to, how much you consume per square meter, the pot life, the working temperature range — and, right next to it, the hazard pictograms, the H- and P-statements, the CLP classification. Now look at where that information comes from. Almost none of it is in the shop feed. It's in two PDFs: a technical data sheet and a safety data sheet. That is the whole problem of construction-chemical product data.

Product data for construction chemicals is datasheet data: application information and safety information that arrives as PDFs, not as structured attributes. This is a sub-branch of the broader DIY & hardware challenge — but with a sharper, more specific pain: the value and the compliance obligation both live inside documents that no feed carries.

Why is construction-chemical product data locked in PDFs?

Every other category has some of this problem. Construction chemicals has all of it, because the two documents that define the product are both unstructured PDFs:

  • Technical / application data sheet: substrate, consumption per m², pot life, curing time, temperature range, layer thickness. The buyer's real decision criteria — and none of it is in the feed.
  • Safety data sheet (SDS): GHS pictograms, hazard statements (H-codes), precautionary statements (P-codes), the CLP classification, VOC content. Compliance-relevant, legally required — and again, a PDF.
  • Per-supplier, per-product: every manufacturer formats these differently. There is no shared field order, no clean column layout — just prose and tables inside a PDF.
  • The document must survive: even after you extract the attributes, the original SDS has to stay attached to the product. You need both the structured data and the source document.

Done by hand, this means opening every PDF, finding the right figures, and retyping them into your product record — the single most tedious job in the whole assortment. The structural fix is the same as everywhere: read the PDF and turn it into attributes — here that isn't a nice-to-have, it's the core of the work.

Which standards help — and where do they stop?

Building materials do have connecting standards, and construction chemicals sits partly inside them. ETIM gives a shared classification and attribute skeleton for many product groups; BMEcat is the common B2B transport format for exchanging catalogs. Both are useful — but neither carries the datasheet content:

Data layerWhat ETIM / BMEcat deliverWhere it stops
ClassificationETIM class + defined attributes per groupOnly where the group is well-modeled — niche products thin out
Catalog exchangeBMEcat transports the structured recordOnly carries what someone already extracted into it
Application dataConsumption, pot life, temperature range live in the PDF
Safety data (GHS/CLP)H/P-statements, pictograms, VOC stay in the SDS PDF
Source documentThe SDS itself still has to be stored and attached

In short: ETIM and BMEcat give you a skeleton and a way to move data around, but they assume the data already exists in structured form. In construction chemicals it doesn't — it's still trapped in the datasheet. Closing that gap is the actual work.

How does Productbay turn PDF datasheets into attributes?

The throughline is turning documents into structured, compliant data — and that's exactly what Productbay is built for:

  • Consolidate: import every source once — supplier CSV, Excel, BMEcat, feed URL, FTP, API — and match by SKU or EAN/GTIN so existing products update and new ones are created. The PDF datasheets come in as attached documents.
  • Extract & enrich: AI reads the application and safety data sheets, pulls out consumption, pot life, temperature range, VOC value, GHS pictograms and H/P-statements, maps them onto ETIM-aligned attributes, writes sales descriptions and translates via DeepL — always with a review queue, because safety data is compliance-relevant.
  • Keep the document: the original SDS PDF stays linked as an asset in the DAM alongside the structured attributes, so buyers and compliance always have the source document, not just the extracted values.
  • Publish: two-way sync to Shopify and Shopware, ERP connections (Xentral, weclapp) and feed exports for Amazon, OTTO and Kaufland — each with per-channel transformations.

The point: Productbay starts where ETIM and BMEcat end. The classification gives you the frame; the datasheet gives you the content — and getting that content out of the PDF, reviewed and attached, is the job. Productbay is built for specialist retailers running multi-supplier, multi-channel catalogs — from mid-sized shops to large chains.

Frequently Asked Questions

Let's look at your product data process

Safety data sheets, application sheets, GHS/CLP blocks — construction chemicals hides its data in PDFs. See how Productbay reads those datasheets, turns them into structured attributes and keeps the source document attached, in a 30-minute walkthrough.

Get started